Quezon City Court Acts on Department of Justice Charges
A Quezon City regional trial court issued an arrest warrant on September 4, 2026, against Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte on three counts of grave threats, according to court records and legal representatives. Branch 98 of the Quezon City Regional Trial Court, presided over by Judge Maria Angelica De Ramos, found probable cause to hold Duterte for trial and denied her defense team's motion to defer or recall the warrant.
The Department of Justice confirmed that the case will now proceed to trial. Bail has been set at PHP120,000 for each of the three counts. The issuance of the warrant does not determine guilt, and the legal process moves forward as law enforcement agencies prepare to implement the court's directive.
Origins of the Grave Threats Case
The criminal proceedings stem from remarks made by Duterte during an online press briefing. During the broadcast, Duterte stated that she had spoken with an individual and instructed that President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., First Lady Liza Araneta-Marcos, and former House Speaker Martin Romualdez be targeted if she herself were killed.
Following an investigation, the National Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Justice filed the grave threats charges, arguing that the public statements constituted serious and actionable threats against high-ranking government officials. Prosecutors determined there was sufficient evidence to substantiate the three counts under national legal statutes.
Defense Response and Legal Standing
Paul Lawrence Lim, counsel for the Vice President, confirmed receipt of the warrant and stated that Duterte has no intention of evading the law. The defense team previously sought to dismiss the complaints by arguing that criminal charges cannot properly be filed against an impeachable officer while in office, and maintained that they would pursue all available legal remedies to challenge the court's actions.
Legal analysts note that Duterte's camp can post bail immediately and may elevate challenges regarding the jurisdiction or the warrant itself to higher appellate tribunals, such as the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court. Meanwhile, the executive branch stated that it respects the independence of the judicial process as the case transitions to the trial phase.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!